Open Democracy - 19 November 2014
A recent article on "imperialist feminism" accuses the US women's movement of being a cheerleader for American empire from the war in Afghanistan to the present. Is this a sectarian strategy that misses the target and attacks the liberals instead of the right?
A leftwing analysis that blames the
suffering of women in Muslim-majority countries on the feminist
movement - variously identified as "white feminists", "liberal
feminists", or "colonial feminists" and their "native
informants" or "comprador intellectuals in the South" - has become
influential in US academic feminist circles. While its proponents call themselves
"anti-imperialist feminists", in the interests of brevity I will call
them simply the Antis, in tribute to the anti-suffrage leftists who considered women's rights a bourgeois
distraction from socialist revolution.
A recent article by Deepa Kumar titled "Imperialist feminism and liberalism" argues that US liberals and feminists
supported the invasion of Afghanistan and ignored the victims of the war in
Iraq because of their "ubiquitous, taken-for-granted ideological framework
that has been developed over two centuries in the West...based on the
appropriation of women’s rights in the service of empire".
READ MORE....
International and Global Studies, Sociology and Human Rights: This is the course website taught by Tugrul Keskin
“We are beckoned to see the world through a one-way mirror, as if we are threatened and innocent and the rest of humanity is threatening, or wretched, or expendable. Our memory is struggling to rescue the truth that human rights were not handed down as privileges from a parliament, or a boardroom, or an institution, but that peace is only possible with justice and with information that gives us the power to act justly.”
― John Pilger
― John Pilger
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment