“We are beckoned to see the world through a one-way mirror, as if we are threatened and innocent and the rest of humanity is threatening, or wretched, or expendable. Our memory is struggling to rescue the truth that human rights were not handed down as privileges from a parliament, or a boardroom, or an institution, but that peace is only possible with justice and with information that gives us the power to act justly.”
John Pilger

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Critical Impairments to Globalizing the Western Human Rights Discourse

Nikitah O. Imani, University of Nebraska at Omaha

Nikitah O. Imani. "Critical Impairments to Globalizing the Western Human Rights Discourse" Sociologists Without Borders 3.2 (2008): 270-284.

ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the philosophical implications of Euro-centrism and Eurocentric discourse for the Western human rights narrative. It is argued that there is insufficient theoretical and practical consideration of those implications, particular for advocacy and activity in the so-called “Third World” where such arguments frequently become mere vehicles for the advance of economic and political neocolonialism. In many ways, colonialism with a humanistic, liberal democratic “face”. Finally, a proposition is advanced that if the Western human rights discourse is to be effectively corrected and evolve into a global one, critiques of Euro-centrism from outside the Western discursive world must be taken seriously.

READ MORE.......

No comments:

Post a Comment